Substantial renovation claims are denied more often than any other rebate we handle, and the reasons are consistent.
The 90% figure is asserted rather than demonstrated. “We gutted the whole place” is a description, not evidence. The CRA wants to see what was removed, room by room.
Photographs weren’t taken. Mid-demolition photographs are the single most useful record in a substantial renovation claim, and almost nobody thinks to take them. If your project is underway, photograph everything now.
Invoices don’t distinguish the work. A contractor invoice reading “renovation — $180,000” tells the CRA nothing about scope. Itemised invoices win claims.
The owner filed before the test was met. People sometimes file on a large renovation that genuinely doesn’t reach the threshold, get denied, and conclude the rebate doesn’t exist. It does — for the projects that meet it.
If yours was denied and you believe the test was met, that decision can be challenged.
How objections work →